Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Virgin Killer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Virgin Killer was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal
Between 4 and 9 December 2008, the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation placed this article on its blacklist. As a result, participating ISPs blocked access to this article for a large proportion of British users. For an explanation and official response by the charity that runs Wikipedia, please see the press release by the Wikimedia Foundation, as well as its Q&A. For more information, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/2008 IWF action.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Caption claims girl is "posing suggestively". I fail to see how. What, precisely is her pose "suggesting"??? It clearly is a pose for the camera. I'd characterize it as "assertive". Anyway, my point is that "suggestively" is only in the mind of certain viewers and is far from an objective description.98.19.179.27 (talk) 03:23, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
The second paragraph of the lead section details the previous controversy with the cover. Both the Wikimedia Foundation and the subsequent investigation by the FBI concluded that the artwork did not violate any United States laws, which are the applicable laws because Wikipedia is hosted in the United States.
Not done: Wikipedia is not censored. While obviously a controversial cover, content will never be removed for simply being objectionable, per MOS:OFFENSIVE and WP:NOTCENSORED FMRadio :3(chat | edits | she/her) 19:09, 16 January 2026 (UTC)