Talk:Victoria Harbour

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Victoria Harbour article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Transport: Maritime

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as High-importance).

Hong Kong High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (65)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (75)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (77) • B-Class articles (367)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,408)

Image needed (357)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (6,691) • Stub-Class articles (7,131)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (178) • ...assess the un-Importance (2,193)

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Comment requested

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

User:Huaiwei has insisted not to have the leading paragraphs written in a summary-style, and insisted that some materials are duplicated . (See also the edit summaries .) — Insta ntnood 08:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Tourism section?

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What is with that section?? No tourist actually enters the harbour! I mean the section should be removed, no one actually says that they want to visit the Harbour, and the section does nothing but tell you that it's famous around the world for it's stunning paranormic views of Hong Kong (which it's not). And all the public events aren't actually held in the harbour, but next to it. Jackp 12:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Grammar

There are many instances of poor grammar and awkward phrasing. A native English speaker should review this article.

Image added

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have added the image "Firework display above Victoria Harbour in the 1950-1960s" from the University of Bristol's Special Collections. I work for the University of Bristol. MildEdit (talk) 17:53, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Victoria Harbour

Comment requested

Tourism section?

Grammar

Image added