Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2223963cf50cf57

Jump to content

Talk:Victoria Hand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by TriiipleThreat in topic Episode 17 confusing

Picture

[edit]

Good pick for the picture! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.42.86 (talk) 01:16, 21 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sexual orientation

[edit]

Dark Avengers #11 does infact detail Victoria Hand's same-sex relationship with a fellow S.H.I.E.L.D. agent but it does not identify her sexuality so labeling her a lesbian based on that issuse is original research becuase it does not label her at all. However we can keep the LGBT tags because it leaves room for interpretation while acknowledging her past same-sex relationship.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Episode 17 confusing

[edit]

From the article:

When Simmons and Trip defy her, a relieved Victoria reveals that she and five of her agents figured out what was going on and are working on resisting HYDRA. Hand reveals that she went after Coulson believing him to be HYDRA, but learns the truth when Coulson realizes (on camera) that Garrett is the Clairvoyant.

I just watched this episode (#17), and during this scene I was convinced that Hand was indeed HYDRA and was cunningly trying to manipulate Simmons into believing that Coulson was HYDRA (or at least doubting him). I am sure that is how the viewer was supposed to understand the scene.

But then I was totally confused when Hand turned out not to be HYDRA and regained Coulson's trust. I don't understand how that was established. How does unmasking Garrett show Hand to be innocent? I am still baffled by that. I can only assume the writers erred in making it insufficiently clear to the viewer. 118.210.239.101 (talk) 15:00, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article is over detailed to begin with, this should all be removed.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply