Talk:Victohali

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

The Historia Augusta is not reliable!

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If the article references the Historia Augusta, it should at least acknowledge that the Historia Augusta is a fraud, and not to be trusted. 72.66.39.198 (talk) 01:31, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Victohali

The Historia Augusta is not reliable!