Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening
Victa lawn mowerVicta lawn mower was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 14 October 2016 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists.
I am the digital coordinator for Briggs & Stratton in Australia and as the owners of Victa it falls within my responsibility. I noticed that Victa in itself does not have a wikipedia page which may be influencing Google's perceptions regarding the brand due to their algorithm. I have attempted to create a small info page about Victa so it becomes clearer to Google's crawlers what Victa actually is. There is no intent to advertise the products themselves on Wikipedia, the purpose of creating a Victa page was to influence Google's knowledge graph to give more information regarding the company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Victa1952 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Victa1952: Because you are an employee of the (owner of the) subject, you have an inherent conflict of interest with the subject. That doesn't mean it's impossible for you to write a neutral article, but it does mean that all your edits will be gone over carefully.
Also, remember that for us to use copyrighted material, the owner (the company) would have to place it under a free license—effectively, they'd have to give it a way. (It's no accident that the guideline page is titled WP:Donating copyrighted materials.) Make sure that's within your level of authority to do—and even if the company does donate the material, that doesn't mean it will remain in the article unchanged. Other editors can (and likely will) edit the text to comply with Wikipedia guidelines such as WP:Neutral point of view. —C.Fred (talk) 01:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
