Talk:Vicky Kaushal/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 04:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

I will review this article, thank you.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 04:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments

• "Aspiring to a career in films" — Can be rephrased as "Aspiring to take up a career in film".
• "His father was keen on his son having a stable career" — As an engineer or any other position in the film industry.

Most likely as an engineer, but the source doesn't explicitly mention it. I therefore wrote that he "thus pursued an engineering degree" later in the sentence. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

• Does any source mention Laal Pencil's genre?

Nope, couldn't find any mention of it. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

• Perhaps a wikilink to "stammering" in case readers don't quite get the meaning at first.

Ssven2, thanks for the comments. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Sources

• Wikilink the publishers/newspapers/websites for ref nos 1 to 7.
• NDTV, Rediff.com, Box Office India, Film Companion, RajeevMasand.com shouldn't be in italics.
• Wikilink the publishers/newspapers/websites for ref nos 10, 11 and 12.
• Wikilink NDTV and The Hindu in ref nos 15 and 16 respectively.
• Wikilink Variety in ref no 20.
• Remove the wikilink for ref no 24 (Firspost) coz there are other Firstpost references before it.
• Wikilink Business Standard, India Today, Bollywood Hungama, Mid Day
• Remove the wikilink for ref no 30 (NDTV) coz there are other NDTV references before it.
• Remove the wikilink for ref no 38 (Filmfare) coz there are other Filmfare references before it.

That's about it from me. Resolve the remaining comments and the article is passed.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:26, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Ssven2, all done. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.

   Pass or Fail:

Thank you for addressing my comments, Krimuk2.0. Congratulations, the article has passed.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:01, 7 April 2019 (UTC)