Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vic Fischer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Fischer spent a decade as director of the Institute of Social and Economic Research and his name is found on much research from that period, so I added the science and academic work group of WP Biography. More importantly, the C rating added in November was totally unearned. The most glaring problem is sourcing, as the present article is poorly sourced relative to the breadth of available sources. We're talking about someone who was the subject of attention from reliable sources for over 70 years. You're going to reward editors for reflecting minimal results from a cursory Google search following his death with a C rating? The timing of this article's creation is an insult in itself, never mind that. There's also a matter of appropriate weight. His life as a whole has been pretty well documented by sources, yet this article dwells a little too much on a few particular things. I've noticed a group of editors who show up at biographical articles following the subject's death and reduce its biographical value. Am I supposed to believe that it's worthy of a C rating simply because of its word count?
