Talk:Via Princessa station
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by Benjaminikuta in topic restroom times
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
restroom times
[edit]i don't think this is strictly relevant to the understanding of the station or its history and operations. -MJDestroyerOfWorlds (talk) 21:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. Also, it would need to be cited and the information regularly monitored for updates. --RickyCourtney (talk) 22:23, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- I think it could be helpful to people. If you're waiting a long time for a train, a restroom is one of the most important things to have. The sign should be enough for such uncontroversial information. Keeping information updated is always a concern on Wikipedia, but the mere possibility that information will become outdated doesn't preclude inclusion in the first place. Benjamin (talk) 23:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a travel guide. That information is better suited for a travel guide or Metrolink's website, not an encyclopedia article. --RickyCourtney (talk) 23:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- I think it's fine here. It's not a subjective opinion, or about a faraway place. It's a true fact about the subject of the article. Benjamin (talk) 23:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a travel guide. That information is better suited for a travel guide or Metrolink's website, not an encyclopedia article. --RickyCourtney (talk) 23:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- I think it could be helpful to people. If you're waiting a long time for a train, a restroom is one of the most important things to have. The sign should be enough for such uncontroversial information. Keeping information updated is always a concern on Wikipedia, but the mere possibility that information will become outdated doesn't preclude inclusion in the first place. Benjamin (talk) 23:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)