Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a294519919bf3524

Jump to content

Talk:Vestments controversy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Editeur24 in topic Needs discussion of what happened after 1600

Ornaments Rubric

[edit]

The first paragraph on the events under Elizabeth I lacks sufficient information on the Ornaments Rubric and the history of its immediate interpretation by Sandys. I suggest link plus a brief additional comment in text.--Jpacobb (talk) 23:41, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think the larger problem with this article is that replicates John Primus's monograph too closely in structure and style. In doing so, it overemphasizes the specialist concerns of 20th-century Elizabethan historiography, and doesn't effectively highlight the controversy's broader relevance to larger reformation and British outcomes.

Needs discussion of what happened after 1600

[edit]

I like this article, though it is perhaps too long and should be split. But it should include discussion of what happened later. Vestments were one of the big items in Church of England disputes in the 1600s. What happened then? editeur24 (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply