Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2442e3b3a1bcf3f

Jump to content

Talk:Verkada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 days ago by Guninvalid in topic COI request: Revising the Controversies section

Connected edit request

[edit]

I'm with Verkada and am following Wikipedia's editing guidelines by making this edit request and not editing myself. Thanks for your help.

  • Please add mailroom management to the list of products in the infobox, and change the items to lower case so it looks better. Here's the suggested text: "| products = security cameras, access control, environmental sensors, intrusion alarms, guest management, mailroom management" I add a source for mailroom management below.  Done
  • Please add operating systems to the first sentence in the lead. Here's the requested revised text: " '''Verkada Inc.''' is a [[San Mateo, CA]]-based company that develops [[cloud computing|cloud]]-based building security and operating systems." This Forbes source which is already in the article describes the software operating system. Done
  • I noticed that there's no source for environmental sensors in the second sentence of the lead. Please add this one: <ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.messengernews.net/news/local-news/2022/04/fd-school-board-approves-bathroom-vape-sensors/ |title=FD school board approves bathroom vape sensors|website=MessengerNews.com |last1=Wingert|first1=Kelly|date=April 26, 2022|access-date=January 20, 2023}}</ref> Done
  • Please update the history with more recent product and funding news. Here's suggested text with sources: "In August 2022, the company announced a mailroom product to help companies keep track of mail packages and shipments coming into their facilities.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.securitysales.com/product-news/verkada-mailroom-cloud-management/ |last=Archer |first=Bob |title=Verkada Mailroom Solution Brings Cloud Management to Mail, Shipments |date=August 30, 2022 |website=Security Sales & Integration |access-date=January 12, 2023}}</ref> In September, the company raised $205 million in Series D funding, bringing its valuation to $3.2 billion.<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.wsj.com/articles/building-security-startup-raises-capital-boosts-valuation-amid-downturn-11663149603|last=Vartabedian |first=Marc |title=Building-Security Startup Raises Capital, Boosts Valuation Amid Downturn |date=September 14, 2022 |website=Wall Street Journal |access-date=January 12, 2023}}</ref>" Done Seakittea (talk) 20:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Connected edits implemented and request marked as answered. Emikey-34 (talk) 02:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


COI request: Updating the History section

[edit]

Hey there, I'm a Verkada employee looking to make improvements to this article. I'd like to start by requesting a few updates to the History. The section is in pretty good shape overall, but I noticed that it's got a few unsourced and outdated claims, and it doesn't contain information about some more recent developments in the company's history. I've put together a draft that I hope remedies those issues.

Here is the draft:

And here is a diff, so that it's easy for editors to tell what I've changed and what I've left alone:

One more note: my draft doesn't include the Data breach subsection because I'm not suggesting any changes to it. Obviously, as a Verkada employee, I don't love it, but I understand why it exists.

If anyone has feedback on my draft, please leave me a note below and I'll do my best to address your concerns. Thanks! Seakittea (talk) 16:17, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Honestly it's mostly a straightforward improvement. Some areas I don't love:
1. Can you compress the funding rounds? It doesn't need three paragraphs. Further, the sources are mixed about $205mm (including WSJ) and $305mm. I'm sure it'll get changed to $205 if it isn't clarified- I assume the $100mm was a follow-on to the $205.
2. Office locations aren't terribly encyclopedic, they can be omitted.
3. Are there reliable neutral secondary sources talking about the mailroom product? It seems to only be echoed by republishing of the press release.
tedder (talk) 16:51, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hey, User:Tedder: Thanks for the thoughtful feedback. I've made some revisions:
  • Deleted the claim about Verkada Mailroom, since I don't have better sourcing for it.
  • Condensed the funding round content, so that it's one paragraph.
  • Got rid of the WSJ citation for the Series D funding round. (You're right that it confuses things a bit.)
  • Deleted the passages about American offices opening. I did keep mention of the Dubai office opening because I think it illustrates how Verkada has expanded geographically, but I defer to your judgment on that one.
Here is my revised draft:
Let me know what you think. And thank you again for taking the time to work with me on this! Seakittea (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Done- I made a few minor changes, mostly around "valuation grew significantly". tedder (talk) 22:04, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
User:Tedder: If I could ask for one more small thing, I just realized there's a typo in the first sentence of the third paragraph. It reads:
"In January 2020, the company raised $80 million in a Series C funding found led by Felicis Ventures, giving the company a $1.6 billion valuation."
Obviously, "funding found" should be "funding round." Other than that, the section looks great now. Thanks for your help! Seakittea (talk) 21:33, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Done- good catch. tedder (talk) 00:02, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

COI request: Adding a Products section

[edit]

Hello! Now that the History section is in good shape, I'd like to request that a new Products section be added to the article. I've composed a draft, which the community can review by clicking the dropdown here:

I've tried to answer two basic questions with this section draft: 1.) What kind of products does Verkada make? and 2.) What kind of organizations use Verkada's products? I hope I've done so without veering into promotional/marketing territory, but more experienced editors can let me know. Thank you in advance to anyone who takes the time to review this request! Seakittea (talk) 20:45, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

User:Tedder: Would you be interested in reviewing this draft? Don't feel obligated, just thought I would ask. Thanks! Seakittea (talk) 22:52, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm going to reach out to User:Guninvalid, who has made productive edits to this article in the past. Guninvalid, if you have the time and inclination to review the request above, I would really appreciate it. And if not, no worries. Thank you! Seakittea (talk) 23:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm generally uncomfortable with having a "Products" section for a currently operating company; it leans really heavily toward being promotional. If you can source the dates when Verkada began offering these products though, it might be okay to fit into the History section. Something like "At its founding, Verkada offered security cameras, access controls, and alarms." guninvalid (talk) 02:21, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
While I'm here, oftentimes with COI edit requests, less is more. It's often much easier and much less likely to be promotional if your edit request is only one or two sentences with a bunch of sources. It's one less thing for me to check; I can just focus on evaluating sources and weight. Writing more risks veering into promotional territory, plus it means I have to already really care to read through your paragraphs. If it's worth elaboration, I'm happy to write my own prose based on your sources and any others I may find. guninvalid (talk) 03:23, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I see what you're saying, User:Guninvalid. In that case, would you be against adding one sentence about Verkada platform's AI capabilities to the History? That feels like a significant development, in terms of the evolution of the company's products, and it's been covered in a CNBC piece. This is the second-to-last paragraph of the History, with my suggested new sentence highlighted in yellow:
Verkada's Series D funding round closed in October 2023 and raised $305 million at a $3.2 billion valuation.[1] In February 2025, Verkada's Series E funding round raised another $200 million at a $4.5 billion valuation.[2] In July 2025, Verkada added AI capabilities to its platform, including a "unified timeline" tool that automatically organizes images from multiple cameras to give users several angles of a single incident.[3] A December 2025 funding round led by Alphabet's venture capital arm CapitalG brought in $100 million at a $5.8 billion valuation.[3] At the end of 2025, Verkada had approximately 30,000 active customers.[4]
Please feel free to either shoot me down or revise that sentence. I'll defer to your judgment. Thanks for taking time to discuss this request with me. Talk soon, I hope! Seakittea (talk) 23:06, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
The sentence is fine, but the source itself isn't the best. WP:CNBC is generally considered a reliable source, but this is an WP:INTERVIEW with the CEO, and reads more like a breathless press release than objective reporting. It would be best to provide 1-2 more sources for this claim, though it's probably okay to add as is. guninvalid (talk) 01:33, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
User:Guninvalid: I think that CNBC source is the highest-quality one I have, in terms of the reliability of the outlet itself and the depth of the coverage, but I'll give you a few more. At worst, maybe these provide some additional context:
  • Silicon Angle (Dec. 2025): "The [Verkada] platform also provides other AI features. It can review data from the Verkada sensors at a given location and activate an on-site alarm when suspicious activity is detected. Administrators can also activate the alarms manually via an app."[5]
  • Reuters (Dec. 2025): "San Mateo, California-based Verkada, founded in 2016, makes cloud and AI-powered physical security platforms that consolidate cameras, access control and alarms on a central dashboard [...] The company said the investment will accelerate its AI capabilities and may also provide liquidity for employees."[6]
  • Security Sales & Integration (Sep. 2025): "Building on its suite of AI features like People and Vehicle Analytics and AI-Powered Search, Verkada introduced a new tool to visually reconstruct the entire journey of people and vehicles across a property. With the new AI-Powered Unified Timeline, Verkada Command will unify video events from all cameras onto a single, map-based timeline. Paired with expanded AI-Powered Alerts that include activity- and industry-specific detections and an Operator View that centralizes alerts into a ticket-based system with a structured workflow."[7]
  • The Tech Buzz (Dec. 2025): "Verkada just became the latest poster child for AI's march into physical security, with Google's CapitalG leading a $100 million round that values the startup at $5.8 billion. The valuation jump of $1.3 billion since February shows how quickly investors are warming up to AI-powered security solutions [...] The secret sauce lies in Verkada's cloud-based platform that connects cameras, alarms, and sensors into a single AI-powered system. Instead of just recording footage, these devices actively analyze what they see. The company processes over 20 million images per hour, extracting insights about foot traffic, occupancy rates, and security violations that traditional systems miss entirely."[4]
Hope that gives you something to work with If you need anything else, please let me know! Seakittea (talk) 17:24, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Done in revision Special:Diff/1359685995. guninvalid (talk) 16:56, 16 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the help, User:Guninvalid! Seakittea (talk) 00:44, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. Staff, S. S. I. (2023-10-10). "Verkada Closes Series D Fundraising Round With $305M in Fresh Capital". Security Sales & Integration. Retrieved 2023-11-23.
  2. Garfinkle, Allie (February 19, 2025). "Exclusive: Verkada's $200 million Series E values the company at $4.5 billion". Fortune. Retrieved March 26, 2026.
  3. 1 2 Yip, Jaures (December 3, 2025). "Security startup Verkada hits $5.8 billion valuation in latest funding round led by CapitalG". CNBC. Retrieved March 26, 2026.
  4. 1 2 "Verkada hits $5.8B valuation as Google bets big on AI security". The Tech Buzz. December 3, 2025. Retrieved March 30, 2026.
  5. Deutscher, Maria. "Security device startup Verkada raises funding at $5.8B valuation". Silicon Angle. Retrieved June 5, 2026.
  6. Srivastava, Prakhar (December 3, 2025). "Security tech firm Verkada valued at $5.8 billion as workplace safety demand rises". Reuters. Retrieved April 21, 2026.
  7. Archer, Bob (September 24, 2025). "Verkada Rolls Out New Updates During VerkadaOne Conference". Security Sales & Integration. Retrieved June 5, 2026.

COI request: Revising the Controversies section

[edit]

Hello again! I'd like to place another edit request, this time for revisions to the Controversies section. I'm aware that, as a COI editor, other folks are going to be rightly skeptical of any changes I propose to this section. Please know that I'm not trying to sweep negative content under the rug. The company has been involved in a few controversial developments covered by reputable press publications, and so I understand that discussion of these things on our Wikipedia page are fair game.

My draft, which you can review side-by-side with the current section and/or by itself below, attempts to do two basic things:

  1. Clean up the description of the Motorola lawsuit so that it's easier to follow
  2. Reframe the facial recognition technology passage so that it covers specific criticisms of Verkada in the cited Washington Post article, rather than more general criticisms of facial recognition technology

And here is the draft by itself:

Happy to discuss this draft with other editors. Thanks in advance to whoever takes a look! Seakittea (talk) 19:27, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Pretty straightforward copyedit. Honestly, main criticism is that the reliability section might still be too long for being attributed only to one source. But if no one else objects, I'll implement this tomorrow. guninvalid (talk) 07:42, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much! Seakittea (talk) 17:09, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Done in revision Special:Diff/1365724256 guninvalid (talk) 02:19, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply