Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26d4cf92f721de6

Jump to content

Talk:Verdun Maple Leafs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago by SatyrTN in topic Requested move

NHL alumni for Senior Verdun Maple Leafs

[edit]

§ - played for junior and senior teams

NHL alumni for Junior Verdun Maple Leafs

[edit]
Modern team?

Other Verdun teams

[edit]
Verdun LaSalle

Verdun Maple Leafs may have become Verdun / LaSalle in 1950-51.

Verdun Cyclones 1946-48
Possible rival junior team, Verdun Cyclones. See hockeydb.com and Gump Worsley
Verdun Bulldogs

QPHL team in 1939-40

Verdun CPR

1929-31 team in MMRHL and MCHL

Verdun Eagles

1946-47 team in QPHL

Verdun Pirates

1963-65 team in QueSr.

Above lists are in progress. Flibirigit 03:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

I propose to move Verdun Maple Leafs (hockey) back to Verdun Maple Leafs, and leave Verdun Maple Leafs (football) where it is. I feel that that senior and junior ice hockey teams which existed over a span 50 years, are more notable than the junior football team which existed for six years. At best, the series of stub articles for the Quebec Junior Football League should be merged into one article. Flibirigit (talk) 22:51, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

NOTE:I have combined all the stub articles into Notre-Dame-de-Grace Maple Leafs. Now Verdun Maple Leafs (football) redirects there. Flibirigit (talk) 08:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Outcome

[edit]

X markN Given the three weeks discussion time and the tepid (at best) comments above, I'm going to decline the move. If I've misinterpreted the comments or if I've missed something, please re-open the RfM. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 04:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.