Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22fcf9f6b6624ce

Jump to content

Talk:Venix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Hskrivervik in topic [untitled]

[untitled]

[edit]

Is Venix really based on System III? Running the Venix 2 emulator, it's missing System III commands like cpio, dirname, rsh (the restricted shell). It doesn't have named pipes or the uname system call, both of which were introduced in System III. To me, it looks like a pure version 7 system with a few bsd extensions (csh, ex, vi, rmail).  Preceding unsigned comment added by Agarvin (talkcontribs)

First Venix port/version was indeed based on Version 7 Unix per the 1984 PC Mag review. Venix hasn't received much attention thereafter, so I don't know if there even was a version based on Sys III. Someone not using his real name (talk) 06:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
I think I've seen SysIII-based Venix, but I don't know where. TUHS doesn't seem to carry it in their archives. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Venix 2 has no traces of System III, it's a pure V7 with the usual BSD enhancements. This is from hands on experience – I have a 2.1 system operational on a 286 vintage machine. Hskrivervik (talk) 10:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
BTW -- I don't think there ever was a Venix/286. Hskrivervik (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply