Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a255ccc17c1bb86e

Jump to content

Talk:Velocette MAC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Special Category for British Motorcycles

[edit]

As part of the Motorcycling WikProject I am working though all the missing articles and stubs for British Bikes. To make things easier to sort out there is a special Category:British motorcycles Please add to any British motorcycle pages you find or create. It will also help to keep things organised if you use the Template:Infobox Motorcycle or add it where it is missing. I've linked the Category to the Commons Motorcycles of Britain so you could help with matching pics to articles or adding the missing images to the Commons. The people behind the bikes also bring it all to life - I've created the Category:British motorcycle pioneers so please have a look wyham and see if you can add or expand any? Thanks Thruxton (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Articles should be categorized as per Wikipedia:Categorization. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:05, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal: Velocette MAC (WD) into Velocette MAC

[edit]

I hereby propose that Velocette MAC (WD) be merged into this article, as the former is a development the latter and the resulting merged article would cover both in the detail they are currently being covered without being unduly long. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 23:40, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Agree. --Biker Biker (talk) 09:06, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Don't see a problem, the bulk of the WD article can probably be dropped straight into the middle of this one. I can't recall why there was the original separation but that was long ago now. Go for it. GraemeLeggett (talk) 10:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply