Talk:Vehicle frame
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
X-frame
[edit]The term X-frame redirects here through a section page, yet in this very page there are no single reference to the term. Should one be made? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.223.93.188 (talk) 14:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, yes, there does need to be a section on them as long as it's well-written.--Ridge Runner (talk) 17:19, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Article
[edit]This article is ranked "high" as to its importance, but did not have a single reference for the material in it. It needs much more work on it! Furthermore, the previous lead image does not clearly illustrate a vehicle frame. Rather, it shows a cutaway of the tire, brake, suspension, etc. I have left in, but it really needs to be removed. I have provided a new lead picture of a bare vehicle frame. It makes the entire component visible and makes it simpler to understand the subject, per WP:LEADIMAGE guidelines. One other comment, there is little to no value to providing and Wikilinking the brand names in the image captions because they are irrelevant for purposes of this article. Thanks! CZmarlin (talk) 04:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)