Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
There is a common consensus that there should not be a dedicated "criticisms/controversies section" per Talk:Vaush/Archive 1.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people.
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
This page is protected. You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days).
theres multiple instances where he has talked about the age of consent, horse cock and even got caught with CP on a live stream. there isnt just one instance of this, dude legit is a degenerate ~2026-75310-0 (talk) 19:01, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yeah that's true but Wikipedia doesn't want to get sued by people. So articles about living people (on WIkipedia they call 'em Biographies of Living People, or BLP for short) are really strict on what they can include. You can check out WP:BLP to see restrictions on what that is but, even though he did messed up stuff, we can't include them unless they are published in reliable sources. Even then, some editors may not want to (they don't want Wikipedia to get sued). Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as EasternShah 22:18, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Is Yonkers Times not reliable? I think something like this MUST be put on an article about him. People need to know about his diabolical folder ASAP, that fucking monster. KeysofDreams (talk) 04:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 months ago6 comments4 people in discussion
I am wondering whether other people also agree, but I think that 7 YouTube videos from the subject of this page is too many. The first use of primary citation 5 isn't appropriate, we need secondary sources determining what is due. There are 5 lines cited to it in its second instance, which is UNDUE because it is only supported by a primary source. Source 3 isn't needed, there is a secondary source already supporting what it claims. 6 and 7 are his remarks surrounding a controversy of his, I am not sure whether or not these should be used, which is why I bring them up. Otherwise, the primary sources seem to be fine for ABOUTSELFUser:Easternsahara20:19, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I have re-added these for now so there can be some more discussion. I think most of these uses are ok. Primary sources can be used with care so long as they are reliable and not used excessively and indiscriminately (which would be undue weight). The primary sources used in the article are reliable enough since they are backing up info about Vaush's statements and beliefs. I believe they are also due weight, since they are expanding on info already in the article, or included in an interview with a relatively high profile journalist (see WP:INTERVIEW for some considerations about reliability and due weight for interviews). Shapeyness (talk) 02:10, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Owen Jones is a journalist, but the video is on his own channel (it is WP:SELFPUBLISHED). Not sure whether journalists are considered experts at interviews, but, more importantly, Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer. This can mean to remove it. Let's be conservative and assume that it means self-published sources are considered primary in this context. WP:PRIMARY guidelines 5 and 7 are relevant here. Yeah, only 2 sentences but this ain't due if no one else reports on it.
Also the sources for the university graduation: why do we cite a YT video, where people are given their diplomas, when we have a better source already?
The responses to the statements he made can be kept if you find other BLPs whose self-published sources are used as responses for their controversies. Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as EasternShah 02:35, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer. This isn't relevant here since the statements are coming from Vaush himself.
On PRIMARY guidelines 5 and 7, the article isn't entirely based on primary sources and caution has been taken on where they are used. Again, the considerations outlined in WP:INTERVIEW were taken into account for the use of interviews and other primary sources expand on information already in the article to ensure due weight. I don't mind the university graduation primary source being removed though.
The responses to the statements he made can be kept if you find other BLPs whose self-published sources are used as responses for their controversies Please see WP:OTHERCONTENT, arguments should be based on sources, policy etc., not what other pages do.
I'm interested to hear what others think, but my opinion is that these uses are within policy and provide useful encyclopedic information. That has also been the consensus previously (see archive 1 for more discussions), although of course consensus can change and those discussions were not necessarily big discussions with input from lots of editors. Shapeyness (talk) 04:20, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply