Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a250fe744ad22da2

Jump to content

Talk:Vaterite

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 days ago by ~2026-39947-37 in topic High Temperature?

Colour

[edit]

The vaterite crystals can be greater than 10 microns in diameter. I am doing research on Molar Tooth fabrics, and most of the former vaterite crystals are greater than 10 microns.One of my SEM images

How can vaterite be called 'colourless' if it only exists in particles with sizes on the order of visible light wavelengths? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.214.77 (talk) 10:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Questionable photo

[edit]

I highly doubt that the photo shows vaterite. Similar crystals from other occurrences are always calcite, and I am not aware of such large vaterite crystals (compare http://www.mindat.org/gallery.php?min=4161).

Uwe Kolitsch (Mineralogist) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.130.153.43 (talk) 19:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The source is the Rob Lavinsky collection - so I'd accept it for what it says (see the image page File:Vaterite-sea12c.jpg from commons. Vsmith (talk) 22:06, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Stabilizer (and destabilizer)

[edit]

I think I have read that RE ions stabilize vaterite. The source of this information was probably the German mineral magazine Lapis in the second part of the 80s but this is probably not a primary source. According o the monohydrocalcite article Mg inhibits the formation of vaterite (and even calcite)

High Temperature?

[edit]

The article claims it converts to aragonite at "high temperature (60°C)". That's wrong. I don't dispute the temperature, I dispute the claim that 60 C is a "high temperature". Certainly for *biology*, 60C is fairly high - thermophiles exist above 45C but hyperthermophiles are those organisms living above 80C - but I'm not aware of any other usage that would agree...maybe superconductivity? Anyway, it's just wrong because it misleads. My experience is that high temperature chemical reactions are those which occur well above 200C but it varies considerably. Sure, it depends on context, so what is the context here? I think the context should be mineralogy and geochemistry. In neither does 60C qualify as "high temperature". I suggest "elevated" be used.~2026-39947-37 (talk) 01:58, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply