Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22d8e76ed62d319

Jump to content

Talk:Vanity label

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by 195.62.221.194 in topic Fish People

Extra text?

[edit]

Fixed the table close to allow the references to appear at the bottom properly.

Also, removed the following text unless someone knows what it's for:

Hard Records N 4Deep Do Not Change

Ddddan (talk) 03:43, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Shady/aftermath/g-unit

[edit]

should we add something about shady/aftermath and g-unit records?(havent g-unit albums also counted as shady records albums, which also count as aftermath albums, which also count as interscope albums?)

Posthuman records

[edit]

What about Marilyn Manson's Posthuman Records imprint? They released Godhead's 2000 Years of Human Error —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.70.24 (talk) 23:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rocket records?

[edit]

Should Rocket records be here? My Elton John albums have a logo for this label on them. I also seem to remember from somewhere John founded the outfit in his 70's heyday. - Thanks, Hoshie 08:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Replex Records

[edit]

Rephlex Records shouldn't here. It isn't controlled by a Warp Records. I don't think Rephlex will even allow it's music to be sold on Warp Records' digital music store Bleep.com. Makes a good case for removing it. Agreed? ClarenceAtomkraft 06:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reprise Records

[edit]

Should Reprise really be here? It was founded as an independent label, not as part of WB. Lukpac 02:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

No parent?

[edit]

Why are Idlewild Records (TMBG) and Super Records (McFly) here if they don't have a parent label (at founding) listed? --Rob* (talk) 09:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fixed it with Super Records, but it's unclear for Idlewild. According to the TMBG article, it seems that Idlewild Records is a truly independent label, since I don't see any parent label listed for it. They use Zoë Records to distribute CD versions of their albums. --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 06:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

GOOD records?

[edit]

founded by kanye west, common is signed im pretty sure 121.98.147.250 (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tuff Gong

[edit]

Can Bob Marley's Tuff Gong Records be added to this list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.253.11.226 (talk) 08:06, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fish People

[edit]

Can the label 'Fish People' set up by Kate Bush for her releases from 2011 onward be on this list? I believe EMI records is the parent company 195.62.221.194 (talk) 10:15, 21 August 2025 (UTC)Reply