Talk:Vampire Dog

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Portland Mercury review pending

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

At the Portland Mercury in September, Editor-in-chief Wm. Steven Humphrey requested that Mercury employee and film editor Erik Henriksen review Vampire Dog, but was impolitely rebuffed. Humphrey conducted an online reader poll to decide if he should be forced to comply, and readers overwhelmingly affirmed.^[1] The next day, Henriksen acknowledged ordering the DVD with "slowest possible shipping option."^[2] Twelve days later, Henriksen confirmed receipt of the DVD.^[3] In November Henriksen wondered if the readers had forgotten about the film yet, wrote that he had been looking at the dog's "stupid upside-down face", and asked if actually reviewing the film was still demanded. The readers had not forgotten, and overwhelmingly affirmed.^[4] In his December 20th column, Henriksen failed to review the film at all, instead gathering mini-reviews from attendees of a viewing of the film at his house; these merely listed elements of the film, without reviewing them.^[5]

↑ Humphrey, Wm. Steven (September 19, 2012). "Make Erik Henriksen Watch and Review Vampire Dog". Portland Mercury. Retrieved November 30, 2012.
↑ Henriksen, Erik (September 20, 2012). "I Just Pre-Ordered Vampire Dog". Portland Mercury. Retrieved December 5, 2012.
↑ Henriksen, Erik (Oct 2, 2012) at 12:32 PM "Well, It's Here". Portland Mercury. Retrieved December 5, 2012.
↑ Henriksen, Erik (November 15, 2012). "So... Have You Guys Forgotten About Vampire Dog Yet?". Portland Mercury. Retrieved November 30, 2012.
↑ Henriksen, Erik (December 20, 2012). "Vampire Dog: The Blogtown Review". Portland Mercury. Retrieved December 25, 2012.

Actual review by Henriksen is hopefully still pending. --Lexein (talk) 22:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

[1] Humphrey, Wm. Steven (September 19, 2012). "Make Erik Henriksen Watch and Review Vampire Dog". Portland Mercury. Retrieved November 30, 2012.

[2] Henriksen, Erik (September 20, 2012). "I Just Pre-Ordered Vampire Dog". Portland Mercury. Retrieved December 5, 2012.

[3] Henriksen, Erik (Oct 2, 2012) at 12:32 PM "Well, It's Here". Portland Mercury. Retrieved December 5, 2012.

[4] Henriksen, Erik (November 15, 2012). "So... Have You Guys Forgotten About Vampire Dog Yet?". Portland Mercury. Retrieved November 30, 2012.

[5] Henriksen, Erik (December 20, 2012). "Vampire Dog: The Blogtown Review". Portland Mercury. Retrieved December 25, 2012.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Vampire Dog

Portland Mercury review pending