Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23041ea292dea0a

Jump to content

Talk:Value change dump

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by MarkMLl in topic Stropping etc.

Not understandable: "record the values in memories"

[edit]

What does "... unable to record the values in memories" mean? How could a file format "record values in memories"?

What is referred to here?

  • Is it that only binary values can be represented (in contrast to analog values, like from an oscilloscope) - I don't know if this is actually the case or not.
  • Something to do with state? Flip-flops?
  • Something else?

--Mortense (talk) 21:38, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

The manual for GTKWave mentions: "VCD ... recent versions of the viewer default to dynamic VCD recoding in memory through some interesting tricks with zlib compressed VLists". Could that have something to do with it? --Mortense (talk) 23:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Stropping etc.

[edit]

It's interesing that VCD requires that keywords be explicitly marked or "stopped", since this is very much a throwback to ALGOL. Neither Verilog nor (for that matter) VHDL require this, and neither does Structured Text from IEC 61131.

The way that, at least as of the 2005 version of the standard, numbers are referred to as "reals" with no provision for integers of varying bases is also redolent of ALGOL (specifically, ALGOL-60).

This suggests that VCD is, in fact, a much older format, and I'm almost surprised that there isn't an 80-col limit enforced for compatibility with punched cardsMarkMLl (talk) 08:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply