Talk:Value-action gap
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Some adjustments/additions
[edit]Hi all!
I am a masters student who has been assigned writing a Wikipedia article! I have studied barriers to pro-environmental behaviour and I have many sources that can contribute to this page! I was planning on re-organizing and adding to the barriers to behaviour section. Please let me know what you all think as I go along - I will slowly be adding to my sandbox.
Cheers -- I.Love.Trees.Yes.I.Do (talk) 16:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hey all, fyi I will write my own article and not be working on this one anymore. I.Love.Trees.Yes.I.Do (talk) 22:03, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, firstly, thank you for your time, effort, and knowledge you’ve brought here.
I’ve unfortunately recently argued against most of your edits on the articles talk page, but I only did so in the interest of the project. While the depth you’ve provided to the topic regarding environmentalism is invaluable and important, it’s gotten a little distracting; it outshines the namesake of the article.
Maybe a dedicated subsection would be more appropriate? UsersLikeYou (talk) 04:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
German speaking article is not about value-action gap...
[edit]...but about a debate around copyright. Unfortunately, I do not have permission to remove the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.174.171.8 (talk) 17:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Which link? --I.Love.Trees.Yes.I.Do (talk) 16:36, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Environmental overarching theme is excessive and unrepresentative of concept. I think this article should be framed as a psychological topic, with the environmental consequences added as a page section.
[edit]What do you guys think? UsersLikeYou (talk) 04:16, 14 July 2022 (UTC)