Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21fac3d4e9ba0d6

Jump to content

Talk:VT220

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Esr in topic ANSI standard

Compatibility with modern hardware

[edit]

I suggest adding a paragraph about compatibility with modern hardware. I have a VT220 attached to my computer. It is in my opinion something rather outstanding, that you can use 25 year old hardware together with modern hardware without problems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Polemon (talkcontribs) 10:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


Generated character codes

[edit]

The table recently added is rather confusing, as it doesn't (very obviously) differentiate between application and numeric modes, nor does it point out that F5 is typically BREAK and doesn't generate any codes at all. It's also unclear as to what the difference between VT100/VT220 modes are (as the terminal, IIRC) doesn't distinguish between them (as opposed to the VT52.)

This link may be of some help: --moof 01:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

ANSI standard

[edit]

The intro paragraph calls the vt220 an "ANSI standard" terminal. This is wrong for so many reasons.

First of all, "ANSI" is the American National Standards Institute. There are hundreds of ANSI standards, so using "ANSI X3.64" (or "ECMA-48") would be more correct.

Secondly, the vt220 is ANSI compatible, but it's not ANSI "standard" in that it doesn't implement the standard in full.

There's so much misinformation around the use of the term "ANSI" with regards to ANSI X3.64 escape codes. The Wikipedia page for that is also 90% incorrect or irrelevant.

But at least there's plenty of content, right? Who cares about correctness when we have a big dumping ground of barely-researched garbage....?  Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.164.138.19 (talk) 02:16, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Feel free to fix what you believe is incorrect. This is an editable web site, not a printed book. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:33, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have fixed this. Esr (talk) 09:15, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dynamically Redefined Character Set

[edit]

The current test says "the VT200s allowed for another 96 characters in the Dynamically Redefined Character Set (DRCS), which could be downloaded from the host computer". The VT220 can only hold 94 printable character in this set. (The VT320 can do 96.) Lars Brinkhoff (talk) 16:03, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply