Talk:Useful art
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Bobprime in topic Inconsistency in article
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed merger
[edit]I am in favour of merging this (insubstantial) article with Applied arts. 08:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Inconsistency in article
[edit]If the term Useful arts was coined in the Victorian era how was it used in the US Constitution. I am removing the coined in Victorian Era reference as it can not possibly be true. Bobprime (talk) 03:05, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class WikiProject Arts articles
- WikiProject Arts articles
- Stub-Class Engineering articles
- Mid-importance Engineering articles
- WikiProject Engineering articles
- Stub-Class Invention articles
- Mid-importance Invention articles
- WikiProject Invention articles
- Stub-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles