Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a235cc67fb60ada9

Jump to content

Talk:Uranate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

How is this word pronounced??? Stonemason89 (talk) 13:12, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead and snicker, but looking at how other compounds are pronounced in terms of stress, it's the same pronunciation as "urinate". Which is why it's here. 72.178.12.19 (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thing this is funny, take a look at the others there. Kausill (Talk) (Contribs) 14:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article for deletion?

[edit]

I intend to re-write this article, based on Wells, A.F (1962). Structural Inorganic Chemistry (3rd. ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0198551258. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) pp 966-969. However, nothing of the present article will be retained, because there is nothing in it about uranates - it's all about oxides.

Should the article first be deleted so that a clean new start can be made? I'm thinking it might then qualify for DYK Petergans (talk) 20:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please just overwrite it. Although it is clearly off-topic, deleting it would take too much time and effort. BTW, it would qualify for DYK without 5x expansion. Materialscientist (talk) 05:26, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Done! Petergans (talk) 09:27, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

The DYK should have been kept for Apr 1. Nergaal (talk) 17:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Uranate

[edit]

Isn't just for U(VI)? Similar to manganate, chromate, chlorate? Shouldn't 4+ or 3+ be uranite? Nergaal (talk) 17:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Debatable. I thought I was following IUPAC in naming oxyanions as -ate(X), but I haven't checked. In any case this nomenclature is unambiguous, -ite is not. The -ite in uraninite signifies a mineral, not an oxidation state. Petergans (talk) 08:03, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Soddyite, becquerelite and curite are not uranates...

[edit]

... as long they contains the uranium as uranyl cation, not in an anionic form.-Luzomim (talk) 20:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply