Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a254c733bdfac526

Jump to content

Talk:Urain Ge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 03:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

  • Source:
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: Hope it gets reviewed for 16 December 2025 DYK feature.
Created by M.Billoo2000 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

M. Billoo 13:15, 21 November 2025 (UTC).Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

    Hook eligibility:

    • Cited: Yes
    • Interesting: Yes
    • Other problems: No - This hook would be appropriate for an article about the campaign, not the song
    QPQ: None required.

    Overall: @M.Billoo2000: Article is new and long enough. I don't see any issues with sourcing or neutrality. Since the article is about the song and not the campaign, the hook has to be about the song as well. That being said, a campaign to build 141 schools deserves an article of it's own. Maybe the article can be created and some material from the "Influence" section here can be moved there as well AmateurHi$torian (talk) 19:46, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

    Furthermore, I don't think the lines about the 2014 Tsunami March are relevant to the article. -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 19:55, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
    @AmateurHi$torian: thank you for commenting. I could not write more than 1500B for separate articles, so I merged them. Further, the political context is added only because the singer had appreciated the unity. I will this weekend what I can do. M. Billoo 01:18, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
    @M.Billoo2000: As for this nom, if you can suggest an ALT hook that's more relevant to the song, I'd approve it. -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 02:11, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
    The singer might have appreciated it, but I don't think it deserves a place in the article. -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 02:11, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
    @AmateurHi$torian: I have started another draft. Probably I will go for a double nom now. M. Billoo 03:03, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
    • Source:
    @M.Billoo2000: Okay, the new article has come along very nicely. I still maintain that the part about PTI launching the 2014 Tsunami march and subsequently cancelling it due to the attack (this phrase: "and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) launched the 2014 Tsunami March protest against the alleged fraud in the 2013 Pakistani general election and demanded justice.", and this one:"A day after the attack, PTI's chairman Imran Khan also called off his march protest.") is not relevant to the song, and shouldn't be included in an article about the song.
    Apart from that, "Urain Ge" has no other issues.
    Review for 141 Schools for Peace: It is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, and neutral in tone. No QPQ required. Maybe "Influence" and "Milestones" can be combined into a single, chronological "Timeline" section in order to comply with MOS:OVERSECTION.
    I cannot approve ALT1 since "martyr" is not an encyclopedic term. I like ALT1a very much. -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 15:37, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
    @AmateurHi$torian: Complied, thank you! M. Billoo 18:18, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
    Approving ALT1a only. Thanks for creating these articles; May the souls of the victims RIP. -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply