Talk:Uptown Funk/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 20:27, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Very well written article. I copy edited a few spots to make sentences flow better. Watch for overlinking and slang; I removed multiple links to Unorthodox Jukebox and changed "nail the guitar take" to a more formal phrasing.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   There are a lot of Wayback links, but they all seem to be working. Every site referened seems to be reputable and third-party.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Very thorough in its coverage. The song's conception, composition, critical reception, chart history, and cultural impact are all covered extensively and fairly. This happens to be one of my favorite songs, so I was interested in the content and learned quite a bit.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Overall the article is very well written and just need a few little minor tweaks.