Talk:Unlink (Unix)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Unix-like

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

unlink is specified by the POSIX Specification and the Single UNIX Specification. GNU Core Utils follows POSIX. But they do not always follow it to a T, since it is not POSIX certified. However, there are many other libraries that also follow POSIX in a similar manner: BusyBox, ToyBox, Microsoft Posix (which has influenced Windows kernel greatly ever since Windows NT... but fully follow posix, such as fork, was moved to an optional package), and FreeRTOS to name a few.

I believe Apple obtained POSIX certification with OS X 10.6. So it can be said that it is actually more Unix-like then most Linux's (cite needed, but there are a lot of flavors of Linux that are not POSIX complaint).

It is not a big enough note to add these details to the article. But I thought I would mention it. Most operating systems, including Windows (at least at the kernel level), are Unix-like.

TamusJRoyce (talk) 23:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Unlink (Unix)

Unix-like