Talk:University of Miami
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Tarlby in topic GA Reassessment
 | University of Miami was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the University of Miami article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA concerns
[edit]I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Is anyone willing to address this concern, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:17, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. Tarlby (t) (c) 17:45, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Lots of uncited statements, including entire sections. While some editors cut uncited statements in February, work seems to have stalled and there is still lots of text to find citations for. Z1720 (talk) 16:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delist, the first four references I checked on a quick spot check:
- [29]:
says nothing about "William E. Walsh" - [36]: doesn't support the 1968 date
- [178]: doesn't support the paragraph, which also includes an arguably WP:EXCEPTIONAL claim
- [184]: permanently dead link
- It's clear this needs a full source-text integrity check, or there can be no confidence that this meets criterion 2b. That is a gigantic task for an article with 213 references. IAWW (talk) 21:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.