Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a224770b89b72c38

Jump to content

Talk:Universal coefficient theorem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Felixhens in topic Homology-cohomology duality

Riveting stuff. Can't think why there's no discussion. --Northener 18:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)(Delete this if it offends you)Reply

The article seemed "poor" so I expanded it a bit. 192.167.204.9

The coefficient theorem can be stated for any R-module, why does the text only mention abelian groups? 147.52.66.56 (talk) 15:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Clarify

[edit]

Could someone please explain what 'expected' result means in "which could be thought of as the 'expected' result"? Randomblue (talk) 12:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I removed the "expected" claim, since it's obviously POV and mathematically irrelevant. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 02:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
The trouble with simply removing all and any heuristic remarks is fairly obvious, though: it reduces the chance that anyone who doesn't already know what is going on will find out. Such remarks are only "irrelevant" to the experts, in other words. Mathematical article here already lean too far towards the "preaching to the converted" approach. The needs of the general reader should be considered, and language that would be appropriate in a survey article should not just be culled, in my view. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:02, 5 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

More Examples

[edit]

This page should include examples from complex algebraic geomtry.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.138.65.246 (talk) 02:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

No, this page should include examples from projective algebraic geometry!
No, this page should include examples from triangulated categories!
No, this page should include examples from global analysis!
No, this page should include examples from homotopy type theory!
But... why? 2001:A61:430:CE01:A955:A4AD:B2C3:79D8 (talk) 20:35, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Homology-cohomology duality

[edit]

Apparently, when coefficients are taken over a field, this theorem implies that is the dual vector space of . It may be worth someone who knows why (or if) this is true adding it to the "corollaries" section. Felixhens (talk) 18:42, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply