Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a255261f6c5d7fd8

Jump to content

Talk:Unit-weighted regression

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Qwertyus in topic Reference to technical term?

Terminology

[edit]

Is this article worthwhile and properly-named? Would it be better as "un-weighted regression" or "ordinary regression"? Melcombe (talk) 15:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Weight Loss Example

[edit]

Just... Why? Who wrote that? It looks like troll work. A better introductory example is needed, preferably one without needing to resort to using an alternative definition of the word, "weight". This could obviously confuse someone with no knowledge of weighted regression, perhaps someone thinking of using, say Wikipedia, to learn about it. So this weight-loss example... Think up a better one. And flag the troll who wrote it. Please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.234.68.129 (talk) 20:15, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Reference to technical term?

[edit]

The expression "bouncing betas" occurs in the example. What does this mean? Is there a reference; wiki or otherwise? --85.224.69.186 (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps it's from the referenced paper. In any case, it's obviously an informal way of saying that regression coefficients differed per study, as can be expected when different studies use different predictors with naïve multiple regression. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply