Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25ef4e199c0fa14

Jump to content

Talk:Union of Scranton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 2600:1004:B161:E230:603E:86DD:15B0:D32A in topic Questioning use of term "UU churches" in this context
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Union of Scranton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

X markN An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Questioning use of term "UU churches" in this context

[edit]

In North America, at least, the term "UU" churches is much more associated with Unitarian-Universalist Churches than it is churches in communion with the Union of Utrecht. I don't think that this abbreviation should be used with this meaning in Wikipedia, unless always given full contextualization as it is here (and it still looks confusing!). 2600:1004:B161:E230:603E:86DD:15B0:D32A (talk) 04:09, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply