Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a45468c19e9bc424

Jump to content

Talk:Unified Code Count

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress

Untitled

[edit]

I want UCC to show line-in change for logical add, del, mod. Is there any possibility for finding the changed position in files for logical mod,add,del.

future changes

[edit]

The statement " The US Government has made UCC its standard for code counting" seems like an exaggeration. In any event, it needs to be supported by an appropriate reference; otherwise it should be removed.

CodeCount originated in the 1990s I believe. It was certainly around then. The author seems unaware of this history. I don't know enough about it to make the edits. Hope someone is willing. 840anchor (talk) 16:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

There are a lot of biased-sounding bits in this article ("esteemed" really jumped out at me). However, I'm hesitant to go through and remove them lest I make it worse than it started. I'm also not really sure which template should be used in this case, on the main article. Hopefully, someone with more Wikipedia experience can at least add a template to the page to make sure it gets cleaned up some. -- Lewellyn talk 20:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Suggest deletion/shortening?

[edit]

At least at a glance this read like an add, wordings is all "buzzwordy" boasting on questionable metrics like "lines of code directly representing productivity". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.219.187.2 (talk) 11:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

There are broken links in the section describing the documentation (Release Notes, User's Manual, and Code Counting Standards). These should be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeLski (talk • contribs) 14:27, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:222nd Broadcast Operations Detachment (BOD) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:50, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply