Talk:Unidad para Chile
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 21 March 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Unity for Chile to Unidad para Chile. The result of the discussion was moved. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 21 March 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
Unity for Chile → Unidad para Chile – The English name has no PTOPIC with Unidad por Chile (not confusing at all, I know); in fact I'd lean towards por being PTOPIC on pageviews and the fact that para was only separate from por for a single election. charlotte 👸♥ 08:23, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
- Support per nom, no common English name.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:06, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
- Support. Very confusing. Dab page at the base name? Moscow Mule (talk) 23:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
- Support Quite confusing indeed and especially in this context when "por" and "para" are commonly translated the same. Either one could be rendered this way in English. Disambiguation is worth it here. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 22:44, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
