Talk:Unavailability
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Klbrain in topic Shouldn't this be merged with Availability?
 | The content of the Unavailability page was merged into Availability on 18 December 2024, and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Shouldn't this be merged with Availability?
[edit]These 2 paragraphs belong in Availability 77.216.53.3 (talk) 15:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
It's more than two paragraphs now but, yes, there's no reason I can see to have two articles about the two sides of the same coin. I have put up merge banners and directed discussion here. ~Kvng (talk) 13:45, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's more than 2 paragraphs, but almost completely unreferenced - and the reference is so poor and inappropriate that it is not worth moving across. So, functionally speaking, a redirect.
Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 16:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC)