Talk:Ultrawide formats

Discussion

Hi Ne0, this table would be great on a new "Ultra Wide Screen" page. Especially since you mix Cinematic, consumer electronics and information technology systems. Each of thos already have separate pages, by the way. I did a few edits and corrections, but this could still be expanded more. Christian Wolff (talk) 13:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

It seems you wanted to add 16:9, so I added some reference aspect ratios. 36:10 is the resolution of the new IMAX film format, that was superseded by Screen X 270°. 24:10 is a monitor format, as well as a film format. --Ne0 (talk) 04:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Actually, no, those were the 21:9 anamorphic formats from CTA-861 (with a 4:3 pixel aspect ratio). But, as I said, please go ahead and create your Ultra Wide page, and then you can collect all the aspect ratios you want on there. Christian Wolff (talk) 16:45, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

ok, almost done with the article. --Ne0 (talk) 08:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

What do you think ? --Ne0 (talk) 09:59, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Looks good, for a separate "Ultrawide display formats" page. Please do not integrate this into the 21:9 page, for reasons I explained before. Thank you. Christian Wolff (talk) 14:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Finally published it. --Ne0 (talk) 08:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

sample video ?

Want sample video for curved 3840 x 1200 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.81.157.250 (talk) 11:12, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Suggestion: Add section on professional/enterprise ultrawide displays

I work for Jupiter Systems, so I'm disclosing a conflict of interest and suggesting these changes for community review rather than editing directly.

The article currently covers ultrawide formats in cinema, consumer gaming monitors, and smartphones, but doesn't mention the adoption of ultrawide formats in professional and enterprise environments. The 21:9 aspect ratio has been adopted for command and control centers, corporate collaboration rooms, and unified communications, which is a distinct use case from consumer gaming.

Suggested addition

A new subsection under "Ultra-wide aspect ratios" titled "Professional and enterprise applications":

"The 21:9 ultrawide aspect ratio has also been adopted for professional and enterprise applications, including command and control centers, network operations centers, and corporate collaboration environments. In 2020, Jupiter Systems introduced the Pana series, bringing large-format 21:9 5K (5120x2160) LCD displays to the unified communications and collaboration (UCC) market. Microsoft subsequently designed its Signature Teams Rooms with a Front Row layout optimized for ultrawide enterprise displays. In the professional AV market, 21:9 displays are used to provide operators with a wider field of view than traditional 16:9 displays, reducing the need for multi-monitor setups in control room environments."

Sources:

• rAVe [PUBS] - "Jupiter Systems Enters New Display Category with 21:9 Aspect Ratio UCC Display Dubbed PANA" by Gary Kayye (November 1, 2020) https://ravepubs.com/jupiter-systems-enters-new-display-category-with-219-aspect-ratio-ucc-display-dubbed-pana/
• AVNetwork - "L'Oreal Poland Redefines the Modern Workplace" (March 5, 2025) - case study of Jupiter Pana displays in enterprise workspace
• AVNetwork - "The Jupiter Pana 34, a Tech-Forward Desktop Productivity Tool" (May 13, 2022)
• AVNetwork - "Jupiter Reimagines Return-to-Work Environment" (July 5, 2023) - covers Jupiter's Pana 5K ultrawide LCD series
• rAVe [PUBS] - "Jupiter to Highlight Its Line of Pana 21:9 Displays at InfoComm 2022" (June 8, 2022)

This is a factual gap in the article - professional ultrawide displays are a real market segment that the article doesn't address. Cp1414 (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Press release churnalism articles are generally not regarded to be usable sources. MrOllie (talk) 14:25, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Fair point on the rAVe source. Replacing with: Cindy Davis, "Videoconferencing Award-Winners: What the Judges Had to Say," AVNetwork, July 28, 2023 (https://www.avnetwork.com/news/award-winning-videoconferencing-solutionshear-what-the-judges-had-to-say). Editorial coverage of independently judged industry awards, Jupiter Pana X recognized in the videoconferencing category. Would this work as a source for the suggested addition? Cp1414 (talk) 10:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

No. I see no legitimate reason to highlight your company's product here. A different citation that also copy-pastes vendor marketing language doesn't change that. MrOllie (talk) 11:49, 2 July 2026 (UTC)