Talk:Ulna

Untitled

would be nice to have an image showing an external view of a normal, live human arm with arrows pointing out the ulna (and radius) so i could get an intuitive feel for which is which. it's hard to tell from the abstacted, meatless dry bones on this page.

Exercise

Is there any exercises that build mass to the muscle on this bone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.112.128.155 (talk) 00:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Mergers

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Proposed merge with Ossification of ulna

I have proposed this merge, between the 'ossification' page and this article, because:

• I feel it is needlessly fragmented to have two separate pages.
• It is standard on Anatomy pages, and recommended in WP:MEDMOS#Anatomy, for 'Development' sections to be displayed on the same page.
• Additionally, this page is small and it would give more context to have the information displayed in a central location, rather than hidden on a separate article.
• If necessary, this article could be expanded at a later date. LT910001 (talk) 07:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

This merge was most probably done, as a "See also" section link to "Ossification of ulna" now redirected to this article; I have removed this obsolete link. 76.10.128.192 (talk) 02:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done apologies for not updating this. This was completed previously. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Upper extremity of ulna

Particularly unhelpful as a separate article - needless fragmentation that makes it more difficult for the reader to access useful information. I propose merge Tom (LT) (talk) 09:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Body of ulna

As above Tom (LT) (talk) 09:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Lower extremity of ulna

As above Tom (LT) (talk) 09:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

With no objections I have completed these mergers. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bone fractures

Yes, my [citation needed] was a little sassy, but I checked and it actually isn't in any of the listed sources. More relevantly, do we need a section in the main body that specifies that bones aren't invulnerable? It seems highly silly. Spaig (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)