Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a245d5d57af4d858

Jump to content

Talk:Udarnik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Wschroedter in topic Suggestion for merging articles

Suggestion for merging articles

[edit]

This "udarnik" article seems very similar to the "agitprop" one. I would kindly suggest mixing the two if noone has anything against it.
Thanks.
Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 11:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

While agitprop aims at ideas, udarnik aims at productiveness. But Stakhanovite movement and Model worker should checked for mixing. Wschroedter (talk) 14:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Udarnik" meaning in Croatian and Serb languages (and probably Russian)

[edit]

Udarrnik = "the strikeful one".

No onther explanation is needed. I saw various incorrect translantations, so I'll just take 'em out :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AurgelmirCro (talkcontribs) 14:05, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

'Strike worker'

[edit]

Surely the standard English translation of this term is 'shock worker'? 'Strike worker' suggests a worker who is on strike, or a blackleg worker who is continuing to work in defiance of strike action. There is no unambiguous direct translation of course, and 'shock worker' isn't a native English phrase. --Ef80 (talk) 18:52, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Stakhanovites

[edit]

See "Politics and Society under the Bolsheviks". Stakhanovites were often beaten or murdered by other workers.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.39.71.98 (talk) 09:42, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

See pages 176, 177.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.39.71.98 (talk) 09:45, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

So arent these people just party-designated scabs with a better name?

[edit]

It sounds like if a new collective was striking to try and get better bargaining power the state would just send excess labor from existing collectives to force them out of work 108.192.152.217 (talk) 20:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

There weren't strikes going on in any established Stalinist regime (they were not allowed). The purpose of Udarniks was to serve as models to be emulated by other workers, and to shake things up with the goal of higher production. AnonMoos (talk) 14:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply