Talk:US Uncut

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP:ORIGINALSYN sentence

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed the following sentence:

On February 24, 2016, US Uncut published an article with the headline that claimed it was "stunning" that Bernie Sanders led nationally by 6 percent in a Reuters National Poll, when the national polls from the same day at the nonpartisan fivethirtyeight.com had Clinton at 49.1% and Sanders at 39.4%.^[1]^[2]

because I believe it violates WP:ORIGINALSYN, which states: "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources." It appears that this sentence combines the two sources to imply the conclusion that either US Uncut is trying to mislead readers on this issue, or at least that US Uncut did not provide a satisfiably complete assessment of the situation. Regardless of whether or not these conclusions are true, they must be made by a reliable source to be included here. Trinitresque (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

↑ FiveThirtyEight on February 24, 2016. "National Democratic Primary Polls". FiveThirtyEight.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
↑ Tom Cahill on February 24, 2016. "Stunning New Reuters Poll Shows Bernie Sanders Leading Nationally by 6 Percent?". US Uncut.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

Disagreement about link and sourcing

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

@Oregon4progress: Since this is a defunct website, the infobox should link to the correct, defunct URL, not to a URL for a different website. And the source cited doesn't seem to support the claim that Clayton was "the original administrator of the page according to court documents". Please don't re-add this material without consensus. —Granger (talk · contribs) 12:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

[1] FiveThirtyEight on February 24, 2016. "National Democratic Primary Polls". FiveThirtyEight.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

[2] Tom Cahill on February 24, 2016. "Stunning New Reuters Poll Shows Bernie Sanders Leading Nationally by 6 Percent?". US Uncut.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

[1]

[2]

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:US Uncut

WP:ORIGINALSYN sentence

Disagreement about link and sourcing