Talk:UPL Limited
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 7 years ago by PamD in topic Note re name
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the UPL Limited article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note re name
[edit]I moved this from "UPL Limited" to "UPL (company)" and said "No sign of it using "UPL Limited" - and as the "L" is for "Limited" it wouldn't make sense
": I now see that the formal name of the company is indeed "UPL Limited", but no way is it the common name - see its own website. I still think that "UPL (company)" is the name which complies with WP's naming policies. PamD 10:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Stub-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Maharashtra articles
- Low-importance Maharashtra articles
- Stub-Class Maharashtra articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Maharashtra articles
- Stub-Class Mumbai articles
- Low-importance Mumbai articles
- Stub-Class Mumbai articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Mumbai articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class Agriculture articles
- Low-importance Agriculture articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles
- Stub-Class chemicals articles
- Low-importance chemicals articles

