Talk:Typhoon Page

Typhoon Page has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 15, 2018. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Typhoon Page appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 August 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Typhoon Page was the record-setting sixth tropical cyclone to hit Japan in 1990?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2017/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Typhoon Page (1990).

Wikipedia

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Page (1990)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Oof-off (talk · contribs) 14:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Criteria

Good Article Status - Review Criteria

Further information: WP:WIAGA

A good article is—

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.^[1]

Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);^[2]

(c) it contains no original research; and

(d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.

Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;^[3] and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

^[4]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

^[5]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.^[6]

Review

Well-written:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	Prose is concise and clearly presents the main aspects of the article. There were some grammatical and spelling errors that I fixed.	Pass
(b) (MoS)	Complies with the manual of style guidelines	Pass

Verifiable with no original research:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	There are a good amount of reliable resources in this article that verify the meteorological history of the storm and the impact of the storm.	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	The sources used in this article are reliable (HKO, JMA, JTWC, IBTrACS, Digital Typhoon) and cover the subject matter	Pass
(c) (original research)	There is no original research	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	There is no copyright violations or plagiarism	Pass

Broad in its coverage:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	This article covers the major aspects of Typhoon Page, including the meteorological history, impacts, and its part in record(s) (the sixth TC to directly affect Japan in 1990, the latest typhoon to hit Japan at the time)	Pass
(b) (focused)	This article is focused	Pass

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Notes	Result
This article is neutral and covers the topic without bias	Pass

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Notes	Result
The article does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute	Pass

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	While the images used are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales, there is a lack of them within the article. Putting as neutral since, as Figfires has said in several of his reviews, the year of this storm was 1990 and there may be a lack of images. I will look for some to put in the article	Neutral
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	The images are appropriately used with suitable captions	Pass

Result

Result	Notes
Pass	This article is very well-written and researched. The only thing that this article needs is more images, in my opinion.

Discussion

Philippines getting affected by Page

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why can't we include Philippines in Areas Affected? 180.195.204.116 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.195.204.116 (talk) 04:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

↑ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
↑ Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
↑ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
↑ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
↑ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
↑ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1] Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.

[2] Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.

[3] This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.

[4] Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.

[5] Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.

[6] The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.