Talk:Type 092 submarine

Specs

military-today.com says complement of 140 and power 90 MW. Our unsourced infobox says 100 and 58. Kendall-K1 (talk) 03:53, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

The title should be "Type 092 submarine"

The title should be "Type 092 submarine" and keeps consistent with "Type 091 submarine". This is a submarine built and owned by China, and it is better to use the original name. See WP:NCUE and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Type_091_submarine&diff=851434651&oldid=849640024. --Lvhis (talk) 03:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

The reality for THE name XIA

it is just an intelligence referencial for A Chinese remark about their stand for the issue of production and fission of sodium hydrid which is in absolute complication

I am pleased of being replied by US 404 or 405 by news coverage in realistic approach , I do not believe for any major Chinese chemical capability they are far behind Germany or UK or Russia . 2001:44C8:4613:4F0F:1:0:D363:3BDE (talk) 14:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Name change to Chinese submarine Changzheng 6

Single ship classes should be named after the individual ship of the class per norm, such as Japanese aircraft carrier Taihō and Chinese icebreaker Haijing 1411. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 01:27, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

I am reverting this move as the name of the submarine fails verification. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 20:25, 22 March 2026 (UTC)