Talk:TweenTribune

TweenTribune.com reposted, Revised based on Wikipedia editor's recommendations

Editors: This page was deleted, but based on recommendations by WP editor Reallyhick, I have reposted a revised version. He told me the subject meets notability standards and I just needed a better rewrite. The entry might still need editing to fit style (please advise, I'm new), but before anyone posts another "speedy deletion" note, please read the related conversations on my talk page. Thanks so much.

Kiahnicole (talk) 07:23, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Need help changing name header

Can someone tell me how to change the page header (as in, the title that people will search)? I actually didn't mean to have the ".com" in the title. It should mimic other Wikipeda Web site entries like Twitter or Facebook. Thank you. Kiahnicole (talk) 18:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I think I figured it out. Kiahnicole (talk) 22:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Lots of edits in history

To anyone who's raising eyebrows at the edits in the history: I posted this entry a bit prematurely. I needed to fix some things so the article would get off to a good start. But I'm all finished, so I shouldn't need to change anything further unless there is an update with new information. Thanks for your patience and understanding. I'm a Wiki-newb. :) Kiahnicole (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Contesting "Advertisement" note

I made a few modifications to lessen the tone of "advertisement." If anyone could give me some tips on which parts of this article are problematic, it would really help. Meanwhile, please consider two things:

1. The revenue side of this article is important because the increasingly bankrupt news industry is desperately trying to find a working business model. This is one of the early attempts to explore new possibilities. No one knows yet if it's a working solution, so it's not trying to "sell" anything. Please read the cited articles; I think they help to explain the wider scope of this subject.

2. The L.A. Times story alone makes this entry notable, but there are additional notable references.

Thanks for your patience, and I'd appreciate any ideas for making this better! :) Kiahnicole (talk) 06:18, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

There was no speedy tag so I removed your hangon tag. I would recommend giving it one more look and consider doing away with the bullet lists ( which is kind of like a product brochure ), and sections like "a new kind of journalism" which seems promotional. As a new article, few people watch this page, if you want more feedback I would try the helpdesk. Pirate^Argh!!1! 09:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. Kiahnicole (talk) 04:08, 18 January 2010 (UTC)