Talk:Tutte graph

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Polyhedra

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polyhedra, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of polygons, polyhedra, and other polytopes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolyhedraWikipedia:WikiProject PolyhedraTemplate:WikiProject PolyhedraPolyhedra
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

planar embedding in article is mirror image of Tutte 1946

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I do not know if others would consider this to be an issue, but for some reason, the layout of the Tutte graph used in the infobox (this file) is the mirror image of the one in Tutte's original 1946 article. (I made a copy of Tutte's drawing here, and see also the first drawing in the MathWorld article.) Of course the layout doesn't matter if one considers the Tutte graph as an abstract graph, but if one considers it as a planar map this can make a (very small) difference — I got tripped up by this at some point, then forgot about it, and just got tripped up a second time which is why I thought to mention it here. Is it worth "correcting" the layout to match Tutte's original article? Noamz (talk) 08:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Tutte graph

planar embedding in article is mirror image of Tutte 1946