Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23ce4e1bc89b179

Jump to content

Talk:Tulsa Outrage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by 173.176.120.156 in topic Breach of law behind the case

Contested deletion

[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... (your reason here) --Wordgrrl (talk) 23:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

the article clearly states the time and place in which this particular act of vigilantism occurred. The Tulsa Outrage is also an occurrence of note, as it is referenced on many other pages, most notably, perhaps, on the "tar and feather" page, in which it is listed as one of the few modern examples of the use of that method of torture.

Breach of law behind the case

[edit]

"... were convicted by Judge T.D. Evans of the crime of not owning a war bond. " By virtue of which law could people be convicted of such a crime ?

A pacifist might be taxed by the warring state. But buying war bonds isn't compulsory as far as I know in a society like USA where freedom is praised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.176.120.156 (talk) 18:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply