Talk:Tucking

article is useless except for niche cases

How do we get the common definition of this - hiding an erection - into this? There aren't any references but this isn't a primarily trans issue. This is almost always for males. But no one writes a referenceable news article or whatever about it.

People claim that wikipedia is super woke and this is the perfect example of a common phenomena that is completely glossed over for niche definitions. The urban dictionary definition is much more useful. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=uptuck

I had to send someone there because this article was completely useless. 67.185.251.184 (talk) 07:26, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

It seems to me like these are two different things with the same name. A cisgender man hiding an erection for a few minutes and a transgender woman hiding any crotch bulge at all for hours at a time are doing different things, and with different motivations (primarily social or sexual embarrassment as opposed to gender affirmation and safety).

The urban dictionary link you provided seems to suggest "uptuck" is the more common term for what you're describing, and it is currently described here Waistband#Unwanted erections. If you think this is a subject worthy of its own article you're free to try and make one, assuming it meets Wikipedia:Notability.

NoticeMK (talk) 15:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

@67.185.251.184 Shi Pei Pu brought me here lol ~2026-96742-6 (talk) 00:38, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

It seems like it mentions in other that a uptuck is a different thing Which it is as tucking and uptucking are not the same Accountforreportingbadissuesontalkpages (talk) 07:05, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Maybe replace uses of men with cis men or something along those lines?

I feel like since its people who have a penis that can tuck that it should specify cis men when talking about men on this page Accountforreportingbadissuesontalkpages (talk) 07:03, 8 March 2026 (UTC)