Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2430bc2e97d3cd0

Jump to content

Talk:Trustees Chambers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Kerry Raymond in topic Still an ANZ bank?

Still an ANZ bank?

[edit]

I can't find any evidence it is still an ANZ bank. If so, the info in the article and probably the article title need to change. I will try and physically visit it and work out the situation. Kerry (talk) 04:16, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Neither - looks to be vacant if that's the same building. I'm not sure what would be a better title: it was always a bank, was the ANZ for at least 35 years (assuming it still was at time of listing), and hasn't been anything significant since, so I'm not bothered whether we list it as ANZ or Bank of New South Wales or? If it stays at "ANZ Bank Building", would be good to move it to ", Brisbane" since there are many others. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yes to all of this. I think our options are ANZ Bank Building, Brisbane or Queensland Trustees Building or else a street address name. Any preference? Kerry (talk) 00:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
I just realised the article uses "Trustees Chambers" a bunch of times and states it was known by that for many years- I'd go with that I think. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Done. Kerry (talk) 00:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
One slight problem. There is another QHR article called Trustee Chambers in Rockhampton. While the names are different, there's still some confusion potential, so I will hatnote them. Kerry (talk) 00:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply