Talk:Trump Mobile

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This article is based on sources exclusively from today. I propose we merge this article into The Trump Organization until it shows that it qualifies to be a Wikipedia article. WP:TRUMPCRUFT, and the fact that this article has little to not encyclopedic value. ^Wiinter_U 03:18, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Oppose - It is significant still, it doesn't matter if all the sources are from today or not. DCAllStar (talk) 03:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Oppose: Secondary coverage from generally reliable sources such as Reuters, CNN, and NBC make this pass GNG. TheGoofWasHere (talk) 03:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Oppose: Doesn't matter how old sources are for articles to be able to use them. What matters most is that the linked sources have the required facts, which these do. It seems like there has been a fair amount of quality news coverage so this article could stay up.

I do admit though that it certainly seems logical to make this article a section in The Trump Organization's article, but that has the risk of making that page too large, seeing as this is a subsidiary of Donald Trump's technology business, so it is more appropriate to go onto that company's page. Qwerty123M (talk) 05:41, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Oppose, as the ownership claim itself is disputable. —mykhal (talk) 07:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Just added a note about Trump Organization's ownership over Trump Mobile in the article TheGoofWasHere (talk) 16:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Oppose. per DCAllStar and TheGoofWasHere. Cfls (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Oppose per comments above freesucrose (talk) 16:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

WP:TRUMPCRUFT assumes the "latest crap Trump got himself into" is a tweet, rumor, or event. A network operator (not even directly owned or made by Trump, mind you) is neither of a tweet, rumor, or event. Also, this article has little to not [sic] encyclopedic value is a real blanket statement since you never clarify how it isn't encyclopedic. TheGoofWasHere (talk) 21:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Oppose - TRUMPCRUFT is not a policy, it's an opinion-based essay. It doesn't make sense to bring up as an argument for merging. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 23:28, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Comment - Seeing that every single response here has been in opposition to merging, I move to close this per WP:SNOW. I won't do it myself since I voted. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 18:52, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

I agree. DCAllStar (talk) 18:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Oppose - quote:

TRUMPSM and all associated designs are trademarks of DTTM Operations LLC. TrumpSM Mobile, its products and services are not designed, developed, manufactured, distributed or sold by The TrumpSM Organization or any of their respective affiliates or principals. T1SM Mobile LLC uses the TRUMPSM name and trademark pursuant to the terms of a limited license agreement which may be terminated or revoked according to its terms.(https://trumpmobile.com/)

Piñanana (talk) 07:46, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

stock photos on TrumpMobile.com

Ukrainian Georgian Serbian

https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/brandnew-car-young-bearded-male-talking-1855550266

https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/friendly-female-customer-support-operator-using-laptop-in-office-gm1213209074-352485953

https://myloview.com/sticker-happy-girl-with-smartphone-phone-looking-at-screen-video-calling-no-111266AA

Piñanana (talk) 09:13, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Footnote at trumpmobile.com

"Trump Mobile". Trump Mobile. Archived from the original on 18 June 2025. .....

TRUMPSM and all associated designs are trademarks of DTTM Operations LLC. TrumpSM Mobile, its products and services are not designed, developed, manufactured, distributed or sold by The TrumpSM Organization or any of their respective affiliates or principals. T1SM Mobile LLC uses the TRUMPSM name and trademark pursuant to the terms of a limited license agreement which may be terminated or revoked according to its terms. Device Protection, Roadside Assistance, Telehealth and Pharmacy Benefits, and all related products and services are offered, administered, and provided solely by independent third-party providers. TrumpSM Mobile does not own, operate, or control these services and is not responsible for their availability, performance, or terms of use. All such services are subject to the applicable terms, conditions, and privacy policies of the respective third-party providers, which will be made available by those providers.© DTTM Operations LLC

@Weirdguyz: this is a legal disclaimer that describes the business, as such it should be cited

Piñanana (talk) 23:21, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

But this is primary. TheGoofWasHere (talk) 23:58, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

It also should not be cited, otherwise every single business would have the same footnote. Weirdguyz (talk) 00:31, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Gavin Newsom issues blunt three-word response after Trump’s gold cell phone scheme hits another snag

Doug Weller talk 19:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

trump phones have come at to the press

This video is from NBC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8d8EojYVtCs ~2026-30230-96 (talk) 03:23, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Launched

but couldn’t get the flag right. . and see .Doug Weller talk 16:56, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Undid Changes that Replaced Trump with Biden

Reversed changes that replaced "Trump" with "Biden" i.e. Biden Tower. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trump_Mobile&oldid=1355489149 ~2026-30378-78 (talk) 04:20, 22 May 2026 (UTC)