Talk:Trueblood Committee

Untitled

Although the article states who formed the Trueblood Committee and the year it was established, it fails to provide citations for the sources used. The information presented is very broad and does not explain what the Trueblood Committee is or its role. When clicking on the external link beginning with "Article," it becomes difficult to navigate the website to find the article being cited. Overall, there is not enough information to have a clear understanding of the Trueblood Committee and its purpose. Alexa hall (talk) 01:26, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

The current article of the Trueblood Committee is very incomplete. It is lacking details about why it was initially created. It is hard to understand what the meaning and purpose of the Trueblood Committee was. This article is very short and explains what the Trueblood Committe stated without going into depth on why Trueblood made these statements. The article needs to be more specific and detailed with why the Trueblood Committee was created and what they recommended. The sources are partially reliable because they are all from text books, both the primary sources and secondary. I do believe that there should be more of a variety of types of sources in order for one to get a better understanding of the topic before passing it onto the wikipedia article. Rjw6 (talk) 04:22, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rjw6, Alexa hall.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)