Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23c9a7459c0f689

Jump to content

Talk:Trinity/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Mz7 in topic GA review

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Brent Silby (talk · contribs) 15:59, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: FarmerUpbeat (talk · contribs) 23:40, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply


GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Overall, looks good. The main things are that capitalization, especially for Trinity/Trinitarian, should be standardized, some places require commas, and, in regards to criteria 3a, Nontrinitarian beliefs could at least have slight context to each of them. Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 23:40, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

@FarmerUpbeat thanks for reviewing the article! I believe I have fixed all the issues that you have mentioned. Brent Silby (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good, thank you so much! I will look over it again :) Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 20:11, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
@FarmerUpbeat I am always happy to work on the article! Looking forward towards your thoughts. Brent Silby (talk) 10:59, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Could you also standardize capitalization of Nontrinitarian/nontrinitarian?
Also, could you confirm that you added a bit of context to nontrinitarian beliefs? Thank you so much for your dedication to this important article! Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
@FarmerUpbeat I think the capitalization in the article is consistent. "nontrinitarian" is always written from a non-capital letter. But also, yes, I have added context for the nontrinitarian beliefs like Arianism. Brent Silby (talk) 15:25, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.