Talk:Trilithon
Add topicLatest comment: 9 years ago by Mustvalge in topic Units
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Roman monolith
[edit]Hello. On what grounds is repeatedly well-sourced material such as Ruprechtsberger removed? The trilithon, just as much as other gigantic monoliths in the ancient quarry such as the Stone of the Pregnant Woman, were cut for the Roman Jupiter temple. There is no "mathematical invalidity" whatsoever in these monoliths and any comparison with the Egyptian Pyramids is fringe, these monoliths are Roman, not Egyptian. Please refrain from further anonymous unfounded reverts as they begin to border vandalism. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see how any three stones (such as those at Baalbek) can suddenly be called a trilithon. The current Wikipedia definition says that there must be two stones supporting a third. Kortoso (talk) 18:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Units
[edit]Feet? Really? At the same time there are tons.. --Mustvalge (talk) 19:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)