Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21d946b1fc84603

Jump to content

Talk:Triangular prism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 days ago by Antonissimo in topic tetracombs

It seems that there are two faces that are triangles and the other three are parallelograms, thus I removed the parts that talked about when the parallelogram faces are triangles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.92.166.209 (talk) 18:10, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I removed this section, didnd't seem very clear or useful as written. Tom Ruen 22:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

To get the surface area of a triangular prism, you need to find the base area(0.5*bh) of the triangle. This is known as A1 in the following formula. The rectanges are known as A2, A3, and A4 in this formula.

The formula for an equilateral triangular base in the prism is:

A1×2+A2×3

The formula for an isosceles triangular base in the prism is:

A1×2+A2×2+A3

The formula for a scalene triangular base in the prism is:

A1×2+A2+A3+A4

To get the volume of a triangular prism you need to find the base area of the triangle(0.5*bh) and the length of the prism.

The General formula that is commonly used is: Base Area*length or 0.5*base*height*length


Yeah that's not as clear as it could be. I don't think it's very good that this article has been left without a volume formula though.
I've tried to add one in again. Something a bit more succinct than the above. Needs work still though. Ideally someone needs to draw a little diagram showing the width height length measurements. I suppose talking about width implies that the prism would be lying on it's side, unlike in the top-right diagram. -- Nojer2 12:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Prisms

[edit]

Prisms are shapes that have no meaning —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.44.136 (talk) 01:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

3.16.16 is t0,1{8, 3}.
3.14.14 is t0,1{7, 3}.
3.12.12 is t0,1{6, 3}.
3.10.10 is t0,1{5, 3}.
3.8.8 is t0,1{4, 3}.
3.6.6 is t0,1{3, 3}.
3.4.4 then logically would be t0,1{2, 3}.

I added that into the article, see also truncated hexagonal tiling. --Professor FiendishMWAHAHAHA!! 03:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Looks good! Tom Ruen (talk) 23:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Repeated section

[edit]


Paragraph? startng with This polyhedron is topologically related as a part of sequence of repeated twice... Jumpow (talk) 16:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

tetracombs

[edit]
The triangular prism exists as cells of a number of four-dimensional tessellation.

It occurs as cells of some uniform 4-polytopes, some of which may be in "tetracombs" (I have not searched the reference), but this is like saying squares exist in some n-dimensional polytopes. Is it really worth mention? —Antonissimo (talk) 02:30, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply